Monday, June 14, 2010

Binay: Man of the Moment

ENQUIRY
DEMAREE J.B. RAVAL

Binay: Man of the Moment
Sunday, 06 13, 2010

Forty-four years ago, in 1966, Jejomar Cabauatan Binay was one of those juvenile, irrepressible, slogan-chanting students who picketed the Manila Hotel and embarrassed the then occupant of Malacanang when they harangued visiting US President Lyndon Johnson with the chant, “Hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?” during the Philippines-Indonesia-Malaysia- Thailand Summit Conference.

Forty years later, in 2006, a more grown-up but still irrepressible Binay again embarrassed another occupant of Malacanang, when he barricaded himself inside the Makati City Hall in defiance of a suspension order that was a transparent maneuver of the Palace to distract attention from its own scandals. The stand-off would have sparked an ugly, rebellion among Makati’s poor had not the court issued an injunctive order, thereby preventing the Office of the President from enforcing its suspension order.

Three months ago, Binay was a dark rider on a pale horse - a “maiden,” in the lingo of racehorse owners­ - who, almost unobtrusively, took his place among jockey thoroughbreds, two of them senators of national reknown, at the starting line in the race for the vice-presidential position. Binay was even handicapped by a black propaganda of having played “stud” to some other filly, an issue that was promptly squelched by an honest, manful admission.

Five weeks ago, who would ever think that Binay, who spurred his horse with a leisurely trot, would find his full gallop at the homestretch and outrun the seasoned thoroughbreds?

Who would ever expect that Binay would come this far so soon? Who would ever think that Binay could make that quantum leap from mayor to vice-president, besting the record of his running mate, who had to start as mayor, then get elected as senator, as vice-president, and then president? I did and, obviously, the 14,501,307 who voted for him last May 10.

On January 6, 2008, this co-alumnus from the UP Preparatory School was my Man of the Year 2007 in this space. I wrote about him then, thus:
.
“The opposition in 2007 was endlessly mocked by apologists of the administration. as having no leader qualified to sit at MalacaƱang if and when.. The opposition, as the lackeys of Arroyo delighted in picturing it, was but a ragtag gaggle of ambitious wannabes, each one of whom desperately wanted to lead….I say hogwash to these obsequious statements, which are actually said more in secret awe of the large roster of qualified men and women in the opposition. It betrays more the uneasiness of those in the administration over the tremors that have been rocking the foundations of the Arroyo government….Binay, better by far than most, has kept the flame of the opposition burning since that grand theft of the May 2004 elections. He had effectively shepherded the surly rage of the corps of FPJ supporters who were orphaned by the death of FPJ. He has never wavered in the fight to bring out the truth in the shameful and shameless election of Arroyo….The loyalty of Binay to the cause of the opposition is without question. Ask the man on the street, and he’d probably tell you that Binay moves around in his crusades without any effort to be recognized….By force of his performance and dedication, he is the leader, albeit the dark horse (pun unintended), who could meet head on and buck off Arroyo’s rusty knights.”
.
More that the president-elect, Binay is my Man of the Moment. His rise to the vice-presidency is never a tale of the workings of Destiny or a happy result of the death of a beloved. The voters who put him where he is now knew exactly what he stood for. They jumped over party lines and chose one whose heart beats for the poor and underprivileged, from whose ranks he rose. Binay, they felt, knows how to respond to their needs, as he did when he was mayor of Makati.

Indeed, it is no fawning declaration from a resident of that city when he claims that the poor do not get sick in Makati; that the underprivileged could die and be buried in dignity; that people can walk down the streets and feel comparatively safer than they would if they were somewhere else. His performance as a seven-term mayor has transformed the face of Makati, a feat never before attained by any other local executive, whether mayor or governor, in the Philippines. Surely, what he has done to Makati, he can replicate in the whole country.

Binay won because his persona best exemplifies the way the opposition against the Arroyo government should comport itself once it assumes the seat of power. Second, Binay has the distinction of having ingrained himself deeply in the psyche of every Filipino who longs for good governance. Third, his influence on the course our country is taking is the consequence of his own ingenuous - or ever ingenious - acts of asserting his will over people and events. And, fourth, he has defined the mores of contemporary society or, at least, provoked the nation into some soul searching.

Having reached this far, Binay is now the right man for the Department of Interior and Local Government. The reservations of a proprietarial few - yes, there exist people who are determined to keep the president-elect within a circle of close relatives, die-hard friends, classmates and “Mommy’s devotees” - and who think that Binay might use this cabinet post to catapult himself to the presidency in 2016, should be dismissed outright, if the incoming administration is genuinely committed to good governance and sincere on its promises to the people.
.
Binay has the B - for balls, to be very frank about it - to deliver and usher in a new climate of good governance, after nine years of a nightmarish descent into hell. And he’ll do it without any bulls**t.

For comments about this website:Webmaster@tribune.net.ph

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Lowered House

ENQUIRY
DEMAREE J.B. RAVAL

Lowered House
Sunday, 06 06, 2010

The failure of the House of Representatives to ratify - before it adjourned sine die last Friday – the bicameral conference committee report on the disagreeing provisions of the Freedom of Information (FOI) bills of the Senate and the House, respectively, is a betrayal of the public trust.

The Right to Know. Right Now! Coalition, of which Transparency International (Philippines) is a member, branded as doublespeak the claim of Speaker Prospero Nograles that he did his best to get the report on the FOI ratified. At the Kapihan sa Sulo yesterday, lawyer Nepomuceno Malaluan, coalition spokesperson, said that even as Nograles publicly professed support for the ratification of the report, there were numerous acts by the House leadership that betrays its determined resistance to secure the ratification.

The Senate had already ratified the report on the FOI in February of this year. Yet, Nograles found every reason not to have the same report ratified by the House of Representatives. On February 2, 2010, copies of the report were distributed to the members of the House, but the members of the House mysteriously went missing at the session hall when it was calendared for ratification. Again, on February 3, 2010, the House adopted or concurred with no less than 15 Senate bills, and ratified one conference committee report. However, the report on the FOI was conveniently left out. On May 24, 2010, Nograles implored the proponents of the bill to withdraw their motion to ratify the conference committee report, and committed to include it in the agenda of the House on May 31, 2010. May 31, 2010 came and went without any action on the report.

Then, on June 4, 2010, after succeeding in convincing Representative Benny Abante, sponsor of the report, to deliver a manifestation on the prospective application of the FOI, obviously to shield some officials in the outgoing administration from any criminal action, Nograles, in a supreme act of betrayal, instead opened and closed the session, blitzkrieg style, and muzzled and gagged the proponents of the bill by turning off the microphones in the session hall, and invoking a quorum call which was unnecessary (or waived) in cases of ratification of conference committee reports.

Abante, CIBAC representative Joel Villanueva, and their colleagues in the House held on to the promise of Nograles to get this important piece of legislation enacted into law, one that has been introduced and re-introduced since 1987 to put flesh to the “right of the people to information on matters of public concern” under Section 7, Article 3 of the Constitution. They kept faith that Nograles will be capable of rising to the challenge of a Constitutional duty. Instead, they were betrayed. The betrayal was carried on national television, gaining for the House of Representatives a new name as the Lowered House, with Nograles as the ringleader of the conspiracy to kill the FOI bill.

This latest act of betrayal of the public trust by Nograles is not surprising to many. Nograles, who will be leaving (thankfully) the august halls of the House of Representatives on June 30, lost his chance at redemption. He will carry that tag that he presided over the affairs of the Lowered House on June 4, 2010.

The Right to Know. Right Now! Coalition will now have to wait for the Fifteenth Congress to tackle anew the bills calling for the enactment of a Freedom of Information Act. A special session of the Fourteenth Congress to tackle the report on the FOI is out of the question: how can anyone expect the principal beneficiary of its non-enactment call for a special session! Common, Cas Navarro, tell that to Sammy Martin, who told me yesterday that he came upon a white envelope with one thousand peso bills bundled about an inch thick left behind on the desk of a member of the House who was conveniently absent when the quorum was being determined. [But that is another story, or is it?]
.
In the Fifteenth Congress, it would do well to put a clamp on the tyranny of the Speaker of the House of Representatives to dictate when a conference committee report should be submitted for ratification. How about an amendment to the Rules of the House in this regard, thus: “Consideration of a bicameral conference committee report on the disagreeing provisions of bills shall always be in order; provided, that such report shall be submitted to the House within five (5) days from the date of the report; provided further, that in case the report is not ratified by the House for any reason within the period of five days from the date of the report, the report shall be deemed ratified nonetheless.” Representative Erin Tanada, who has labored long on the enactment of a Freedom of Information Act, promised to introduce this amendment.

The Right to Know. Right Now! Coalition has vowed to take the campaign to an even higher level. The coalition said that it is not only the right to information that Nograles succeeded in killing, but his word of honor, integrity and leadership. He may have delayed the enactment of the Freedom of Information Act, but he has not defeated it at all. The coalition says that the right to information springs forth from sovereignty that resides in the people; it will endure.

Now, pending the enactment of the Freedom of Information Act by the Congress of the Philippines, we hope that the incoming administration will see to the immediate issuance of an executive order that will govern the access to official records and to documents and papers pertaining to official acts, transactions, decisions, as well as to government research data used as basis for policy development.

For comments about this website:Webmaster@tribune.net.ph